Another
Fine Specimen
06 February 2003
A recent Islamic nuclear edict states: "The time has come for Islam to discharge its nuclear capability in an attack on America."
Also see Saddam's Jerusalem strike force:
Things fall apart, the center cannot hold |
Let no man deceive you with vain words. |
Y
To: J.R. Nyquist It's late and I'm exhausted. As such, I should not be writing this critique of your opinions, without a proper explanatory and for that I do apologize. But the impulse was strong after reading your diatribe and incredible prejudice and hypocrisy. So here it is: you are one very very naive
man, or one big phony. All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on Allah, his Messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the Jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries.... On that basis, and in compliance with God's order, we issue the following Fatwa to all Muslims: Oh Jeff,
Yeah, right, you got it! America's policy is a gift to the
world and especially the poor and suppressed should look up to the U.S. as
their ultimate liberator. And it has been like this for the past century
or so, I guess. Unfortunately, a couple million or so has been
directly or indirectly killed in the name of U.S. interests since world war
II. And mind you, this is not mentioning those, who simply died of hunger
and disease due to the present world trade "order", the various
sanctions (in the name of freedom and humanity, of course!) etc. But just go
on Jeff, tell the world, that Bush is not the oil men's guy (what about Rice,
Cheney, by the way?). Maybe one or two readers out there might even
believe in this childish stuff...
Regards,
Dan Miles
To: J.R. Nyquist ..um yeah , Bush is a real genius, the idiot thing is just a trick to fool
the communists.
To: J.R. Nyquist It was NEVER about terrorism, the Russians or Chinese. This is what it is about now and into the future. wake up jeffrey!
Dear Mr. Nyquist: Jesus gave himself on the cross, when he absolutely did not have to. He could have easily performed a miracle. My interpretation is that - he died on the cross because he wanted to show that love and peace are more important than life itself. Of course, I could be wrong and there could be all kinds of perceptions. Also, I do not know whether you have seen the poverty and sickness in
other
Jeff... Sorry, can't accept that advice [that Scott Ritter has no credit]. I'm well aware of the charges made about Ritter. Farah has made sure EVERY nasty report has been on his (pro-Sharon) "IsraelNetDaily" website. Have you read JUSTIN RAIMONDO'S piece about it? Probably not. Appeared a few days back on Antiwar.com. Check archives. "Flip flop?" From all I have considerably read about Ritter's past and present positions on Iraq (he has always opposed Saddam and his gang, no different now), his sympathies came to be with the Iraqi PEOPLE and the unjustified horrors he directly observed inflicted on them through the often Draconian and senseless ("dual use" hypodermic needles and graphite pencils long denied) "economic" sanction punishments dealt them by sadistic people in our government over many years. More disastrous, but similar to the "collective punishment" inflicted on the Palestinian population by brutal Sharon. With pervert Clinton, it was Albright and her bunch who thought it "worthwhile" half a million Iraqi children died to somehow "punish" Saddam. Seems to me we now have a new crew of amoral sadists led by Perle and Wolfowitz "advising" Bush to "sock it to them," no mercy to ANY Iraqis. Perle, Wolfie and their equally amoral partners, Cheney and Rumsfeld, practiced that merciless attitude of widespread punishment to Afghans, killed an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 civilians in addition to Taliban, and never did get Bin Laden! Not even concerned about Bin Laden anymore it appears. Or did they earlier kill him? And are keeping his memory "alive" to continue frightening naive Americans into accepting the "necessity" of increasing police state "Homeland Securty" to protect us from the largely invented global reach of terrible "Al Queda?" You know, those "suicidal" Muslims who "hate our freedom" as George believes. (George Jr., America's expert spokesman who on national TV the other day, blurted out "persecute" when his script writers had written "prosecute.") "Awkward" or not, Ritter, a TRUE expert about Iraqi WMD, is courageously protesting such "collective punishment" insanity, so why not quote him, whatever other alleged "misdeeds" are now being used to hopefully discredit or "blackmail" him into silence? Let's have more courage on our parts! Stop an insane, unnecessary war if we can, or at least try. Why do (probably) hundreds of thousands more of innocent people have to die or be maimed to satisfy the blood lust of these amoral sadists temporarily in control of our American government and Israel's government? Stealing Iraq's oil is just EXTRA "frosting" on the war mayhem "cake" these amoral madmen want to "bake."
- [the infamous] Dick F.
To: JRN
I beg to differ sir, I am not a liar at all, though it
does appear that you are. Though I must admit your phrase "a distorted
evaluation born of an ideological fixation" is quite good. How many
nights did you stay up thinking that one up. I stated that "In
essence you are supporting the Bush Administrations claim that criticism of
Bush is in fact support for terrorism." Have you forgotten the
statement made on national TV by Mr. Ashcroft? He stated that those of
us who did not support Mr. Bush were in fact supporting terrorism. (I don't
have the actual quote but I am sure you remember it well) It was
in fact Mr. bush's man Mr. Ashcroft that stated that criticism of Bush was
support for terrorism - plain and simple!
Look up the definition of a dictator. What rights does he have
that have not been extended to Mr. Bush in the name of fighting terrorism?
And in fact, this is exactly the way Adolph Hitler rose to power. The
fact is that Bush has repeatedly stated that he has the right to designate any
American an "enemy combatant" (A phase that his administration made
up by the way) and strip him of his constitutional rights, without recourse or
appeal. And he has done so to at least 2 Americans so far. But we really don't
know how many because his administration is keeping everything secret. Without
transparency there can be no accountability, without accountability there can
be no freedom. It is this threat of arrest and conviction without trial or
appeal that has terrorized millions of people around the world
throughout history. The above are facts, they have nothing to do with my
"ideology" You cannot be accused of slander when stating
the facts. As far as suggesting I am unbalanced because I call Bush a de facto
dictator is idiotic. Given that thousands of people around the world have made
similar statements (many of them publicly bye the way) makes your questioning
my sanity even dumber. But lets get back to the "world of real
objects" - is calling me names the best you can offer in response?
- it is you that needs reconciliation. Again I ask you, how many years
have you served our great country? Oh and why isn't your "opinion"
the irrational, idologically twisted one? You presented no facts in support of
your position. Just because you say so doesn't cut it.
DSD
|